Fysioterapiaopiskelijoiden kivunopetus ja opiskelijoiden kipuosaamisen arviointi

Lähdeluettelo kokonaisuudessaan:

(1) IASP. Declaration of Montreal – Declaration that access to pain management is a fundamental human right. International Association for the Study of Pain 2010. Accessed 3rd April 2023. https://www.apsoc.org.au/PDF/Publications/DeclarationOfMontreal_IASP.pdf

(2) IASP. Desirable Characteristics of National Pain Strategies. International Association for the Study of Pain 2011. Accessed 24th March 2023. https://www.iasp-pain.org/advocacy/iasp-statements/desirable-characteristics-of-national-pain-strategies/

(3) Thompson K, Johnson MI, Milligan J et al.: Twenty-five years of pain education research-what have we learned? Findings from a comprehensive scoping review of research into pre-registration pain education for health professionals. Pain 2018:159(11):2146 – 2158.

(4) Wideman TH, Miller J, Bostick G et al.: The current state of pain education within Canadian physiotherapy programs: a national survey of pain educators. Disabil Rehabil. 2020:42(9):1332 – 1338.

(5) Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A et al.: Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain 2019:160(1):19 – 27.

(6) Carr EC, Briggs EV, Briggs M et al.: Understanding factors that facilitate the inclusion of pain education in undergraduate curricula: Perspectives from a UK survey. Br J Pain 2016:10(2):100 – 107.

(7) Wong ML, Kirk-Sanchez N.: Moving from Strategy to Process: An Iterative and Formative Approach to Integrating the IASP Pain Curriculum Guidelines into an Established Physical Therapy Program. J Allied Health 2021:50(3):213 – 220.

(8) Briggs EV, Carr EC, Whittaker MS.: Survey of undergraduate pain curricula for healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom. Eur J Pain 2011:15(8):789 – 795.

(9) Emerson AJ, Courtney CA, Alcon C et al.: The Current State of Pain Curricula in CAPTE Accredited Doctor of Physical Therapy Programs: A 2021 Report. Pain Med. 2023:24(4):461 – 465.

(10) Hoeger Bement MK, Sluka KA.: The current state of physical therapy pain curricula in the United States: a faculty survey. J Pain 2015:16(2):144 – 152.

(11) Leegaard M, Valeberg BT, Haugstad GK et al.: Survey of Pain Curricula for Healthcare Professionals in Norway. Vård i Norden 2014:34(1):42 – 45.

(12) Murphy L, Lax L, Musa R et al.: Mapping of pain curricula across health professions programs at the University of Toronto. Can J Pain 2018:2(1):182 – 190.

(13) Scudds RJ, Scudds RA, Simmonds MJ.: Pain in the physical therapy (pt) curriculum: a faculty survey. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 2001:17(4):239 – 256.

(14) Watt-Watson J, McGillion M, Hunter J et al.: A survey of prelicensure pain curricula in health science faculties in Canadian universities. Pain Res Manag. 2009:14(6):439-444.

(15) Wideman TH, Miller J, Bostick G et al.: Advancing Pain Education in Canadian Physiotherapy Programmes: Results of a Consensus-Generating Workshop. Physiother Can. 2018:70(1):24 – 33.

(16) Forbes R, Ingram M. New-graduate physiotherapists’ readiness for practice and experiences of managing chronic pain; a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021;37(11):1177-1184.

(17) Ingram M, Forbes R, Jones A. Physiotherapy new graduate self-efficacy and readiness to engage in pain assessment and management: A mixed-methods study. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal. 2019;20(3):65-83.

(18) Synnott A, O’Keeffe M, Bunzli S et al.: Physiotherapists may stigmatise or feel unprepared to treat people with low back pain and psychosocial factors that influence recovery: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2015;61(2):68-76.

(19) Augeard N, Bostick G, Miller J et al.: Development of a national pain management competency profile to guide entry-level physiotherapy education in Canada. Can J Pain. 2022;6(1):1-11.

(20) Hush JM, Nicholas M, Dean CM. Embedding the IASP pain curriculum into a 3-year pre-licensure physical therapy program: redesigning pain education for future clinicians. Pain Rep. 2018;3(2):e645.

(21) Reezigt R, Beetsma A, Köke A et al.: Toward consensus on pain-related content in the pre-registration, undergraduate physical therapy curriculum: a Delphi-study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2024;40(5):1040-1053.

(22) Shepherd M, Courtney C, Wassinger C et al.: Pain education manual for physical therapist professional degree programs. Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy, APTA, Inc.; 2021. Accessed 27th March 2023. https://www.orthopt.org/uploads/content_files/files/Pain_Manual_Draft_FINAL_6.25.2021%281%29.pdf

(23) Thompson K, Johnson MI, Milligan et al.: Rethinking pain education from the perspectives of people experiencing pain: a meta-ethnography to inform physiotherapy training. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e046363.

(24) van Lankveld W, Afram B, Staal JB et al.: The IASP pain curriculum for undergraduate allied health professionals: educators defining competence level using Dublin descriptors. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):60.

(25) Watt-Watson J, McGillion M, Lax L et al.: Evaluating an Innovative eLearning Pain Education Interprofessional Resource: A Pre-Post Study. Pain Med. 2019;20(1):37-49.

(26) Wideman TH, Miller J, Bostick G et al.: Advancing Pain Education in Canadian Physiotherapy Programmes: Results of a Consensus-Generating Workshop. Physiother Can. 2018;70(1):24-33.

(27) Wideman TH, Bostick G, Miller J et al.: The development of a stakeholder-endorsed national strategic plan for advancing pain education across Canadian physiotherapy programs. Can J Pain. 2022;6(1):21-32.

(28) IASP. IASP Curriculum Outline on Pain for Physical Therapy. International Association for the Study of Pain; 2018a. Accessed 6th March 2023. https://www.iasp-pain.org/Education/CurriculumDetail.aspx?ItemNumber=2055

(29) IASP. IASP Interprofessional Pain Curriculum Outline. International Association for the Study of Pain; 2018b. Accessed 24th March 2023. https://www.iasp-pain.org/education/curricula/iasp-interprofessional-pain-curriculum-outline/

(30) Bishop A, Thomas E, Foster NE. Health care practitioners’ attitudes and beliefs about low back pain: a systematic search and critical review of available measurement tools. Pain. 2007;132(1-2):91-101.

(31) Catley MJ, O’Connell NE, Moseley GL. How good is the neurophysiology of pain questionnaire? A Rasch analysis of psychometric properties. J Pain. 2013;14(8):818-827.

(32) Gardner T, Refshauge K, Smith L et al.: Physiotherapists’ beliefs and attitudes influence clinical practice in chronic low back pain: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. J Physiother. 2017;63(3):132-143.

(33) Moran RW, Rushworth WM, Mason, J. Investigation of four self-report instruments (FABT, TSK-HC, Back-PAQ, HC-PAIRS) to measure healthcare practitioners’ attitudes and beliefs toward low back pain: Reliability, convergent validity and survey of New Zealand osteopaths and manipulative physiotherapists. Musculoskeletal science and practice. 2017;32:44-50.

(34) Moseley L. Unraveling the barriers to reconceptualization of the problem in chronic pain: the actual and perceived ability of patients and health professionals to understand the neurophysiology. J Pain. 2003;4(4):184-189.

(35) Darlow B, Fullen BM, Dean S et al.: The association between health care professional attitudes and beliefs and the attitudes and beliefs, clinical management, and outcomes of patients with low back pain: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2012;16(1):3-17.

(36) Parker R, Madden VJ. State of the art: What have the pain sciences brought to physiotherapy? S Afr J Physiother. 2020;76(1):1390.